Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 51,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2023, 2:04 am
A patent claim to the device itself is potentially of greater use to the patentee than a claim to the device including a cartridge, given that the cartridges will generally be sold separately. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:27 am
Galvotec Alloys, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:02 am
By enforcing their patents, owners of SEPs could, if they wished, use the patent enforcement system to ‘hold up’ or prevent competitors from launching rival products that use the same standards. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:27 pm
The metaphor was first introduced in the early 20th century by supreme court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Abrams v US, in which he opined that “the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market”. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
Plaintiffs’ proposed injunction is overbroad because it seeks to bar Defendants’ from any use of other geographic terms, rather than the misleading use of geographic terms. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
The case related to the chemical compound calcipotriol, a vitamin D analogue used for the treatment of skin conditions. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:21 pm
Supreme Court released its opinion in City of Ontario v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Given that such hearing was held, they do not have EDPL standing as to that issue (see id. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Given that such hearing was held, they do not have EDPL standing as to that issue (see id. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
The court held that a significant number of members of the public would be likely to be confused into believing that the two cafes were connected, given their close proximity and the common use of the word ‘Boca’ in their respective names. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:46 am
” At Philly.com, Samantha Melamed reports that, in Pennsylvania, four “juvenile lifers” were “given new sentences as a consequence of Montgomery v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:05 am
Who was expected to use the gift - and was use actually limited to just one person? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
That was the somewhat contradictory outcome in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (docket 10-98). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
That was the somewhat contradictory outcome in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (docket 10-98). [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:55 pm
Max, Obodo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:59 pm
Among the cases in my queue awaiting my analysis is Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm
Given the detailed 64-page analysis of the likely impact on individual species of fish in the 2001 EIS, the complete lack of such analysis of the likely impact on individual species of fish in the 2004 EIS, and the lack of any explanation in the 2004 EIS why it is not 'reasonably possible' to perform some level of analysis of such impact, we have no choice but to conclude that the Forest Service failed to take the requisite 'hard look' at environmental… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:37 am
Disciplinary dismissal not discriminationMyrick v NYC Employees' Retirement System, USSC, Cert. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:05 pm
It is a given that companies strive to protect their intellectual property. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:55 am
"2 1Oriole Gardens Condos., III v. [read post]
