Search for: "United States v. Adam" Results 2621 - 2640 of 2,882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 8:19 pm
Doe CRS report number: RS21334 Author(s): Charles Doyle, American Law Division Date: March 24, 2003 Abstract The United States Supreme Court has rejected constitutional challenges to two state sex offender registration and notification statutes (SORA), Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
United States as a big step towards repealing the exclusionary rule the Court crafted in 1961 in Mapp v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
Here is an early result of the pernicious decision in Herring v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
  Special thanks to Adam Savett of the Securities Litigation Watch blog (here) for providing a copy of the removal petition and complaint in the Deutsche Alt-A case. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:14 pm
Federal Appellate Review post-Rita v United States Sherod Thaxton Book Reviews The Structure of Classical Public Law The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought Duncan Kennedy Barry Cushman Some Realism about Mass Torts Mass Torts in a World of Settlement Richard A. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:37 pm
Here is the abstract:In 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued its only two opinions regarding the constitutionality of sex offender registration and notification statutes. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:33 am
In his famous, and often-cited, concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:47 am
As to Hasibuan's attempt to put forth his same-sex relationship as a reason to let him stay in the U.S., the court cited still-prevailing 9th Circuit precedent, Adams v. [read post]