Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 29,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2007, 1:44 pm
Interesting argument, and interesting lines of questions from the court, although I am skeptical as to how much guidance as to the court’s thinking one can draw from the Justice’s questions themselves. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:02 am
Here is the abstract: In Graham v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 3:26 pm
I agree with Justice Wiley that such a multiplier might well be justified -- and often is -- due to the contingent nature of plaintiff's recovery and the fact that unlike the defendant's lawyers, who are paid hourly, plaintiff's lawyers only recover if they win. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:11 pm
(Hughes v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:38 pm
This reasoning, reminiscent of the Wisconsin Supreme Court's rationale in Lassa v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
But Justice Scalia, writing for the Court, went ahead with the rest of the opinion. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 2:50 am
Chief Justice Warren Burger decided that Roe and Doe, as well as the other cases that were scheduled on the docket, should go on as planned. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:30 am
As Justice Sotomayor highlighted in her United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am
ShareAnother in the line of remarkably trivial disputes the justices have chosen to resolve under the Bankrupty Code, Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Supreme Court in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in Filartiga v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 9:59 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
Weems v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:10 am
Sherman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:26 am
The Amarillo Court of Appeals sided with Chesapeake, with one justice dissenting. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:09 am
And isn't shy about explaining why.Read the whole opinion -- it's 25 pages -- for a full understanding of why the trial court (as well as the Court of Appeal) thought that the owner was unnecessarily churning the case. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:46 pm
In Altmann, the plaintiffs stress, the justices rejected the idea that the general presumption against laws applying retroactively, outlined in Landgraf v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm
Thus was rejected today the prosecutorial conflation of chemical warfare with what the Court in Bond v. [read post]
