Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
The Faculty Lounge has an announcement of a new project at Southern Methodist University, Women’s Rights in America: From Early Stirrings to Third Wave Feminism.Congratulations to Sarah Staszak, whose No Day in Court: Access to Justice and the Politics of Retrenchment (Oxford University Press, 2015) has recently won the J. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
William Talavera v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
United States Issue: Whether a Sentencing Guidelines departure should be subject to appellate review that is conducted prior to, and distinctly from, review of the ultimate sentence for reasonableness and whether the Supreme Court’s holding in Williams v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
Mukasey, and William P. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm
White, Thurgood Marshall and William J. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
As was said by Justice Clark in School District of Abington Tp., Pa. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
Coverage of the Court’s decision in Schuette v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Motion to reargue "A motion for leave to reargue pursuant to CPLR 2221 is addressed to the sound discretion of the court and may be granted only upon a showing that the court overlooked or misapprehended the facts or the law or for some reason mistakenly arrive at its earlier decision" (William P. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Motion to reargue "A motion for leave to reargue pursuant to CPLR 2221 is addressed to the sound discretion of the court and may be granted only upon a showing that the court overlooked or misapprehended the facts or the law or for some reason mistakenly arrive at its earlier decision" (William P. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
Justice Perry was the lone dissenter and in a poignant rebuttal to the rest of the Court laid forth an outstanding explanation why he thought they were wrong. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
” Pequignot v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:19 pm
The question was posed in Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:31 am
Notes:Under Brady v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
Drones and Data: A Limited Impact on Privacy, University of Richmond Law Review, Forthcoming, David Sella-Villa, William & Mary Law School. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
” At Understanding the ADA, William Goren unpacks the oral arguments in Harris and Bostock v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
The first intervening case was the Court's 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Millette, Jr., Chief Judge, Circuit Court, Prince William County, Virginia--W. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Cain 1) Whether there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of Smith’s trial would have been different but for Brady and Giglio/Napue errors; 2) whether the state courts violated the Due Process Clause by rejecting Smith’s Brady and Giglio/Napue claims. 12.6 10-8505 Williams v. [read post]
