Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 8,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Since a toy store will attract children, Justice Saxe believed that Penny Whistle was required to protect its young customers from foreseeable harm. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:19 pm
Bolger v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Young v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
As previously stated, the Court determined that Mason received the benefit of her bargain. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
” Judge Young pointed out that to assist the judges in interpreting the expert’s response to that question, the state and federal Supreme Courts have provided broad starting points, founded in evidence Rule 702. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm
For updates on Lindsay’s case, visit the Hecox v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:38 am
In Carvel International v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:12 pm
The petition of the day is: Caret v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
the Hart and Keller v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
., Wiggins v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
” The leading cases addressing the issue of an individual’s electing a “negotiated disciplinary procedures” rather than an available statutory disciplinary procedure such as that provided by §75 of the Civil Service Law: Antinore v State of New York, 40 NY2d 6 and Abramovich v Board of Education, 46 NY2d 450. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
UNC and Moody v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:31 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada decision in McCormick v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm
Just in time for the start of the semester, Lakhdar Boumediene, the lead plaintiff in Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:02 pm
Today the Eleventh Circuit handed down an interesting ruling on the reasonableness of a sentence in US v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:51 pm
In David & Tina Long v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 1:53 pm
Sorrenti v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:37 am
In the recent case (Hill v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:17 am
Moreover, the court concluded that the County waived any argument that its interest in issues such as reducing teenage pregnancy, depression in young adults, and incarceration rates waived for failure to present the arguments (or a financial interest based on them) to the district court. [read post]
