Search for: "50 Doe Defendants"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 7,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2010, 7:28 pm
Co. v Russell, 50 AD3d 1611 (4th Dept. 2008). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:17 am
The settlement agreement does not say how much of $50 million 2006-2007 program had been eroded by the earlier claim. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
This panel doesn't adopt a nominative use defense for the Second Circuit either, but it does say "a defendant may lawfully use a plaintiff's trademark where doing so is necessary to describe the plaintiff's product and does not imply a false affiliation or endorsement by the plaintiff of the defendant. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:03 pm
Owings, 17 How. 47, 50 (1854); Southern Pacific v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:01 pm
If it appears to the court that the defendant is on active duty, the court is precluded from entering a judgment against the defendant until an attorney is appointed to represent the service-member. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Well-defended cyber terrain is attainable but continually at risk. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:34 am
” 50 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:37 am
Where does this leave us? [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:16 pm
Defendants argued that plaintiffs were seeking to impose disclosure requirements different from the FDA’s policy on natural claims, though they admitted that the FDA does not require a statement of which alkali was used. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
In such cases, employers need to make it very clear that being able to use your own computer does not mean putting confidential information at risk. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:23 pm
Weekly D885aAttorney's fees -- Justiciable issues -- Claim or defense not supported by material facts or application of existing law to material facts -- Error to require that former law firm and client each pay 50% of opposing party's attorney's fees under section 57.105 without conducting e [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:46 pm
In Huron, Associates Against Outlier Fraud (“Relator” or “Plaintiff”) sought $50 million in damages, alleging that defendants Huron Consulting Group, Inc., Huron Consulting Group LLC, and Huron Consulting Services, LLC (collectively, “Huron”), Empire Health Choice Assurance, Inc., and Empire Medicare Services (collectively, “Empire” and collectively with Huron, “Defendants”) overbilled Medicare and Medicaid… [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am
Q: What does the Sackett v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
However, the matter does not stop there. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
However, the matter does not stop there. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
Does the First Amendment allow that? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
They formed an LLC named 372-376 Avenue U Realty, LLC to own the property and entered into a written Operating Agreement as 50/50 managing members. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:56 am
The answer to the two other questions was considered unnecessary, in the light of the answer to the second question (paragraph 50). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:51 am
(Section 77p(f) explains that a class action is “covered” if it has more than 50 plaintiffs.) [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:28 am
I then ask: does the potential defendant have any assets in the U.S. [read post]
