Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 191,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
U S v Lev Parnas Et Al Indictment (PDF)U S v Lev Parnas Et Al Indictment (Text) [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
It’s been 64 years this week since Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 2:50 am
The much awaited decision Avotinš v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:29 pm
The Justice Department has sued American Express because it claims that AmEx has been anti-competitive in how it deals with merchants and some of the rules it imposes on merchants who accept their cards. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Invoking its precedent in Dirks v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:35 am
North Dakota and Beylund v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:46 am
In CODE REVISION COMMISSION and State of Georgia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:50 am
Like many of us, I was pleased with the outcome in Thompson v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Matter of City of New York v. [read post]
Recent Court of Special Appeals of Maryland Case Deals with Authentication & Cell Phone/Tower Issues
2 Oct 2015, 8:17 am
The case discusses a couple of the topics we've been discussing on the... [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:01 pm
Justice Scarth, in Maxim v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 7:57 am
In what will be a four part series on The Legal Broadcast Network, we have been able to pull together an all star cast of analysts to discuss the exceptionally important victory in the Supreme Court this week on the case of Wyeth v Levine. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:45 am
R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 1291; [2009] WLR (D) 350 “A convicted person seeking compensation as a result of reversal of his conviction on the basis of new or newly discovered facts establishing beyond reasonable doubt that there had been a miscarriage of justice had to show that the facts had been unknown to the convicted person during the trial process or an in-time appeal. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:50 am
Link Lending Ltd v Hussain and another [2010] EWCA Civ 424; [2010] WLR (D) 103 “A person, who had been taken into psychiatric care under s3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and had been involuntarily placed elsewhere, was still in actual occupation of her own home under the land registration legislation. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:50 am
ZN (Afghanistan) and others v Entry Clearance Officer [2010] UKSC 21; [2010] WLR (D) 121 “Family members who sought entry to the United Kingdom to join a sponsor who had been granted asylum but had subsequently obtained British citizenship still had to satisfy the rules dealing with applications to join a person who had been granted asylum and, therefore, they did not have to meet the maintenance and accommodation requirements imposed by the general rules relating to… [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:15 am
R (Dost Mohammed) v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:47 am
Bone v Newham London Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 435; [2008] WLR (D) 134 “Where an employment tribunal had held that a complaint of direct sex discrimination and victimisation or constructive dismissal had not been proved, it was not open to the tribunal subsequently to amend its decision to find that her dismissal had been an act of direct sex discrimination and victimisation. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:19 am
Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 286 “On the proper interpretation of ss 14(1) and 15 (3) of the Land Compensation Act 1961 the amount of compensation payable for compulsory acquisition of vacant land on which Victorian houses had stood prior to their destruction during the Second World War should be based on the assumption that planning permission had been granted for specified development even though planning permission for such… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:09 am
All relevant circumstances were factors to be balanced together to assess or evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether due care and diligence had been exercised, and if not, whether that failure had been the cause of the contributor’s ignorance of his obligation to pay the contributions. [read post]
