Search for: "BRIGHT V US" Results 2641 - 2660 of 3,348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am by Rosalind English
This was rejected as inconsistent with the authorities, and in particular with the principle that there is no “hard-edged or bright-line rule”,  EB (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 41, [2009] 1 AC 1159. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Roping in Roper The problem with bright line rules in juvenile death penalty cases 14 J Med Law 281 (2010). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Some studies rely on parents’ reporting; not persuasive v. studies where a doctor confirms that the event occurred. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
 Among other attractions this issue contains a useful survey of six countries in which the courts are happy (or not) to entertain trade mark surveys. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:55 pm
The first issue is whether the bright-line physical presence test for establishing substantial nexus set forth in Quill is limited to sales and use/excise taxes. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:55 pm
The first issue is whether the bright-line physical presence test for establishing substantial nexus set forth in Quill is limited to sales and use/excise taxes. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:59 am by buslawblogger
Siracusano," arguing that "The Use of Statistical Significance as a Bright-line Test... [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:17 am by Fathima Cader
First, the court held that, as per Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]