Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 8,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
(National Restaurant Association v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:25 am
Supreme Court made a ruling on the federal preemption legal issue in these Fosamax cases in May 2019 (see Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
Here in Novorossiya, [Pyotr] Rumyantsev, [Alexander] Suvorov and [Fyodor] Ushakov fought their battles, and Catherine the Great and [Grigory] Potyomkin founded new cities. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:42 am
Originally, the investors sued InterOil, Mulacek, and Nikiski Partners, which is controlled by Mulacek (Todd Peters, et. al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:00 am
The story inaccurately says that State Farm won this battle. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
, pens this post about the well-known and much-debated issue of the product plain packaging [on which see earlier Katposts here, here, here, and here].* Court of Appeal dismisses Rovi's claim construction attempt in battle with VirginA few days ago the Court of Appeal of England and Wales handed down its decision in Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 1214. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
Acquitted conduct has been used here in the Sixth Circuit, and the Court elaborated on this issue in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:58 pm
This ruling is bad for the pocketbook of parties to a custody battle, but great for the pockets of their attorneys. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
And it just doesn't seem like a tenable situation to have the United States say: "If you're on the list, even if we're wrong, there's nothing you can do about it. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:11 pm
These data can be parsed somewhat differently when senators are separated by state. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:26 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text- Scroll to Exhibit 6) in Annunciation House, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:30 pm
Shortly after Roe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Author: Bill Pizzi, emeritus University of Colorado Law SchoolAbortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:14 pm
Now, not only has the evidence that Sebesta suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
Carliner took the case to the Supreme Court, daring the justices – in the year after Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:10 pm
Virginia and Johnson v. [read post]
