Search for: "C. M. v. State"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
The UK Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative earlier this week in its judgment in R v M & Ors [2017] UKSC 58.Issued in the context of an interlocutory appeal in criminal proceedings, this ruling concerned the proper construction of section 92(1) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
I'm done with your unethical behavior. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
" Software Freedom Law Center v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
And, to reinforce this point, several of those claims were state funded claims where the BWC psychologist supported the C-86. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:19 pm
Kerls won in State v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
It came as ’something of a surprise’ that the case had reached the Lords in the light of R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
Donna M., 19 Misc.3d 724 (2008), relying on the Martinez precedent. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:56 pm
State v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 10:04 am
CareDx, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:30 am
Leon Oscar Ramirez, Jr., Individually, and Jesus M. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
§§ 1226(c), 1231(a). [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:26 am
§ 156(c), (g)(6). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Thomas Carter v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:47 am
Promete una participación más amplia en decisiones ambientales y el acceso a la justicia para víctimas de daños ambientales. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Grunert, Scott C. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
“[C]ourts have recognized ‘changed circumstances’ [may] warrant modification. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
M. [read post]
