Search for: "Centers v. State" Results 2641 - 2660 of 21,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:38 pm by Kim Krawiec
Barak’s recent paper on the “rabbinic cartels” reminded me that I wanted to provide some updates on Kamakahi v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 10:32 am by Aime Dempsey
In a case with significant ramifications for employers concerned with protecting sensitive information, and for employees accused of abusing access to computer networks, the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) heard oral argument this week in Van Buren v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Thus, the Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Court's injunction and stated that the Chancery Court need not revisit the issue on remand. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
A policy decision by the employer is not subject to "pre-negotiations;" the impact of that decision on unit members is negotiableMatter of County of Erie & Erie County Sheriff v State of New York Pub. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:10 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court vacated the citation and penalty against Wal-Mart because, given the new interpretation of an ambiguous regulation, the company did not have adequate notice of its noncompliance (Wal-Mart Distribution Center #6016 v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am by Kevin Kaufman
Introduction States are set to receive $195.3 billion in fiscal relief under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), equivalent to 20 percent of the annual tax collections of state governments.[1] With state revenues essentially flat in 2020 (a net decline of less than 0.2 percent), the greatest challenge for states may be figuring out what to do with it. [read post]