Search for: "Court v. State" Results 2641 - 2660 of 207,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In its judgment of 16 February 2021 in Hanan v Germany, [1] the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (‘the ECtHR’) confirmed that the European Convention on Human Rights (‘the ECHR’) applies extraterritorially to the conduct of armed forces deployed abroad by Contracting States. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Christopher Tyner
Late last week the United States Supreme Court decided Flowers v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am by MBettman
On May 8, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Supreme Court Considers Proper State To Tax Trusts: I love tax nexus cases! [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:12 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-2 Tuesday in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:47 am by Andrea Bottorff
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled unanimously [opinion, PDF] Monday in National Meat Association v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 7:12 am by Steven Wildberger
The US Supreme Court [official website] on Wednesday heard arguments [transcript] in Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 3:11 pm by 500law
Star Athletica, LLC, 799 F.3d 468 (6th Cir. 2015), in which the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that designs on cheerleading uniforms are eligible for copyright protection, namely stripes, chevrons, and color blocks incorporated into […] The post United States Supreme Court to hear copyright lawsuit regarding cheerleader uniforms appeared first on Santucci Priore, PL. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 7:32 am by Amy Howe
The denial of review in New York State Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]