Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Cases like United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
I would keep things as they were and not subject basic questions of patent law to an unbounded inquiry under antitrust law, with its treble damages and famously burdensome discovery…” Shortly after FTC v Actavis, the European Commission (“EC”) concluded its 2010 competition inquiry into Lundbeck’s activities relating to restrictive business practices and abuse of dominant position. [read post]
When Can a Franchisor Be Liable for Overtime and Minimum Wage Violations at a Franchisee’s Business?
15 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
Given the recent rise in the FLSA litigation and rather sizable penalties and damages awards assessed against the violators, Orozco v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
However, since its word mark MAGNEXT differed from the dominant element ‘magnet’ of the earlier mark only by the capital letter ‘X’, that mark had an average degree of visual and phonetic similarity to the earlier mark. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 5:42 pm
References The UK case: Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (Vidal-Hall, Hann and Bradshaw v Google Inc);http://www.5rb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Vidal-Hall-v-Google.pdf The ECJ Judgment: C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González” can be found onhttp://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf? [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
In 1992, the Supreme Court of the United States heard a case called Quill v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
Chamberlain’s girlfriend called Barnett and left him a message stating Chamberlain was afraid because inmates were asking for his paperwork. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:37 am
Germany and Argentina v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:47 pm
The big case currently in the news underscoring this point is FTC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm
Khan is Legal Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:20 am
While the decision in R. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
Salas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
Yoder, but merely returns the law to the state as it existed prior to Smith. . . . [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
As the U.S. game opened, the German dominance evoked memories of the pithy law-school brief for the contracts chestnut Hadley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:35 am
Iraq continues to dominate today’s headlines. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:53 pm
In Loughrin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
