Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 40,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
The defendants maintained that Doe’s cancer had already metastasized by the time of the CT scan and was not a curable kind of cancer. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:47 am
O'Neill's plagiarism, it was barely a "2" on the yawn-o-meter. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:05 am
Code § 38-77170(2), despite the defendant’s argument to the contrary. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:05 am
Code § 38-77170(2), despite the defendant’s argument to the contrary. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:16 am
He shouldn’t be doing anything to help them. 2. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., et. al., 2-07-cv-02175 (TNWD November 23, 2011, Order) (McCalla, J.) [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:07 am
Everyone has heard the term "hung jury", but what exactly does it mean? [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 2:37 pm
Ahmed (with 3 named defendants) and People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 3:06 am
According to the Court, though, “counsel’s ignorance of the law or Rules does not justify Rule 60 relief. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 4:22 pm
"Makes sense.But here's the thing that doesn't make sense: That we're having this whole fight over $440.California had to pay for (1) defendant's appointed appellate counsel (plus his counsel in the expungement proceeding), (2) the five lawyers on the caption in this case from the Attorney General's Office, and (3) the salaries of all the people in the Court of Appeal who worked on this matter. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:38 am
The Court ruled that a seizure of a person occurs only when (1) an officer has applied actual physical force to the person (for example, touching or tackling), or (2) absent physical force, the defendant submits to an officer’s “show of authority. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:03 pm
Practice Tip #2: Under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
Resp., D. 23 ¶ 2; see Def. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 4:04 am
If bail is warranted at all, then make it matter, as in $2 billion. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:18 am
LEXIS 226 (June 5, 2009) (5-2) [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
LEXIS 13648, 1997 WL 566252, at **1-2 (N.D. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Dogan: Real passing off does happen, maybe not in so many trade dress cases. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:52 am
These claims are framed under sections 27(1), 27(2), and 27(2.3) of Canada’s Copyright Act respectively. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:23 am
Burnex Corp., 2-07-cv-13029 (MIED July 20, 2009, Memorandum & Order) (Cohn, J.). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:47 am
Only service by the prevailing does so, and defendant never served the order on the People. [read post]
