Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 2641 - 2660 of 8,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Todd Murray
If you're served with a lawsuit in Minnesota, you must answer within 20 days. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:44 am by Greg Mersol
May 13, 2013), the plaintiff, a former Applebee’s waitress, brought suit against the franchisee for whom she had worked, contending that it had not properly taken advantage of the tip credit exception contained in section 6(a)(1)(C) of the FLSA. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Attorney’s Office in San Francisco does not like it, but Jesse J. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:33 pm by Robert Liles
  Payors billed by the dental practice included, but were not necessarily limited to:  DentaQuest (DentaQuest served as the administrator to the TennCare program – Tennessee’s Medicaid program), Delta Dental and Cigna.[1]  Starting in late 2014, a number of payors initiated an SIU dental audit of the defendant’s multi-location dental practice. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
§ 20-1-119 was not filed within a year of the alleged injury. [read post]
  The Fifth Circuit reasoned that § 1332(d)(1)(B)’s definition of a “class action” does not encompass this case because the Louisiana cumulation procedure employed by the plaintiffs does not authorize “representative” litigation. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by Jeralyn
Then, he's likely to be moved to Hotel Kebokoran, which houses Schapelle Corby, the Bail 9 defendants, including those sentenced to death, and numerous rapists, child sex offenders, murderers and terrorists. 1 kilo of hashish and 7 grams of meth does not seem like a huge amount. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:58 am
A 1 percent error rate would mean 22,000 innocent people — more or less the population of Nogales, Arizona — wrongly imprisoned. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Lawrence Solum
Yet the distinction is very difficult to explain and defend. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  This means that if defendant’s negligent conduct made it possible for damages that occurred 20 years later and was not really foreseeable, there would still be actual causation. [read post]