Search for: "FRAME v FRAME"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 8,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Sometimes elegance is refusal.The average consumer and the nature of the purchasing actAs per Sabel BV v Puma AG, the average consumer normally perceives a trade mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyse the various details. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:16 am
Of course it's not.On the one hand, there is a new case currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU): GS Media v Sanoma, C-160/15). [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:45 am
Ladore v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Answer #6 In response to the injunction in Texas v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:11 am
For instance, in Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (T-668/19), EU: T:2021:420, the EU General Court considered that, the assessment of the distinctiveness of sound marks has to be made as to the ‘resonance’ of the mark and is not subject to a ‘significant departure of the norm’ test developed for, eg, shape marks.In the present case, the fact that shades or nuances ranging from copper to brown or… [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:51 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
In one such case, United States Telecom Association. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 8:59 am
Williams v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 10:41 am
As the petitioners in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:26 am
Kitchen door - the frame was pushed out of the wall by the expanding floor boards due to the boiler leak, leaving a gap between frame and wall. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 8:15 am
LLC, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 11:22 am
(Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2014) EWCA Civ 1438 (our note) and Richards LJ’s view that The disqualification effected by (the council’s policy) is fundamentally at odds with the requirement under section 166A(3)(b) of the 1996 Act to frame a scheme so as to secure that reasonable preference is given to people who are owed a housing duty under one of the provisions of Part VII. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:26 am
Kitchen door - the frame was pushed out of the wall by the expanding floor boards due to the boiler leak, leaving a gap between frame and wall. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:04 pm
" Every Nation Campus Ministries v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
"Specification 3 alleged that on or about and between April 23, 1998, and December 17, 1998, Wolfe testified falsely while under oath during an official court proceeding, in violation of Penal Law §210.15.The Appellate Division explained that “It is well settled that the principles of due process applicable to criminal trials apply to government administrative proceedings, citing Matter of Murray v Murphy, 24 NY2d 150” and that the requirements of due process of law… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:55 am
Ohio July 12, 2010), and Bearden v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:01 pm
In Lab Corp v. [read post]
