Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 4,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm
It should be noted that two interests at stake — the needs of the child and the needs of the community — are presumptively entitled to equal weight akin to the rulings in Matter of Todd B., Matter of Timothy C., Matter of Pedro A., Matter of Aaron P. and Matter of Horan A. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 8:15 am
Family Law In Joshua Tree: Some Pointers and a Brief Overview By: Michael C. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
§ 27.005(c).Pickens v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
The Court observed that the formula to determine temporary spousal maintenance that is outlined in Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(5-a)(c) is intended to cover all of a payee spouse's basic living expenses, including housing costs, the costs of food and clothing, and other usual expenses (see Khaira v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
Kovacic 13-933Issue: (1) Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allows a social worker to take temporary custody of a child, without advance notice and pre-deprivation evidentiary hearing, when the social worker has probable cause to believe that the child has been abused; and, if not, whether the contrary legal principle was clearly established in 2002; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit erred by conducting its qualified-immunity analysis of the… [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 pm
The gist of Bill C-560 was the introduction of certain “presumptions’ including a presumption that allocating parenting time “equally” between parents is in the best interests of children, rebuttable only by evidence that equal parenting would not”substantially enhance” a child’s best interests. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:05 am
After a hearing, the trial court found that all four grounds for termination had been proven by clear and convincing evidence and that it was in Child’s best interest for termination to occur. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Kovacic 13-933Issue: (1) Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allows a social worker to take temporary custody of a child, without advance notice and pre-deprivation evidentiary hearing, when the social worker has probable cause to believe that the child has been abused; and, if not, whether the contrary legal principle was clearly established in 2002; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit erred by conducting its qualified-immunity analysis of the… [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
About the Author Matthew Arnold is a Managing Member of Arnold & Smith, PLLC, where he focuses on the areas of family law, divorce, child custody, child support, alimony and equitable distribution. [read post]
26 May 2014, 4:32 pm
Richard C. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:15 pm
This exemption does not apply to collection for child support or spousal support. [read post]
24 May 2014, 6:36 am
§ 615 (f)(3)(C). [read post]
23 May 2014, 12:24 pm
The court finds that the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff was entitled to one half of the defendant's half-interest in the marital residence, which was marital property and subject to equitable distribution based on Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][1][c] and in accordance with Angot v Angot. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:54 am
Skip relinquished his ownership interest in the agency around 1997. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
In this edition, I think the most interesting case (of a number of interesting cases) is United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Kovacic 13-933Issue: (1) Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allows a social worker to take temporary custody of a child, without advance notice and pre-deprivation evidentiary hearing, when the social worker has probable cause to believe that the child has been abused; and, if not, whether the contrary legal principle was clearly established in 2002; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit erred by conducting its qualified-immunity analysis of the… [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:00 pm
She is advocating for a change and it will be interesting to see how the Tarrant County trial court decides this issue. [read post]
18 May 2014, 12:33 pm
Two of the then minor children of J, A and C, are petitioners herein. [read post]
18 May 2014, 2:54 am
” Is your neighbor a child molester, a drunkard, a wife-beater, just salaciously dirty? [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:43 pm
There’s much of interest in the just-published newsletter of the Section on Children and the Law of the Association of American Law Schools. [read post]
