Search for: "In Re Lewis" Results 2641 - 2660 of 2,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
“I have no doubt that Justice Lewis Powell, who wrote the Booth opinion, and Justice William Brennan, who joined it, would have adhered to its reasoning in 1991 had they remained on the court,” Justice Stevens wrote. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
Connecticut (07 Jun 1965) ―You know when you’re walking down the street at night with lights in front of you and behind you, and you get that really dark shadow? [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:52 am by Beatrice Yahia
Maggie Michael, Nafisa Eltahir and Aidan Lewis report for Reuters. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998), and its application to the police pursuit in this case.Appellant Bridgette King (Officer King) is employed as a police officer by appellant City of Memphis, Tennessee (the City). [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am by SHG
It was a woman’s voice: Do you know where you’re going to be driving next? [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jeff Gamso
The Mets run, also in the 5th, came when Joe Christopher singled in Johnny Lewis. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
In opposition, relying on Lewis v Anderson, 477 A.2d 1040 [Del Sup Ct 1984], and its progeny, the plaintiff contended that the reverse stock split was effectuated for the “sole” and “fraudulent” purpose of eliminating her standing to maintain her derivative claims originally brought in New York and later re-filed in Delaware, and on that ground should be rescinded. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Swift J found that a new appeal would simple re-run arguments which had already been made. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
For a further discussion of the requirements, see Julie Lewis & John Rubin, 2 North Carolina Defender Manual § 29.1E (2d ed. 2012). [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:44 am by Karen Hoffmann
Hope Lewis was appointed the inaugural Faculty Director of Global Legal Studies at Northeastern University School of Law. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6364; Lewis v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:33 am by Editor Charlie
We’re not big believers in this $1.5 billion number and it’s not exactly right that Variety reported that number–the Variety story has changed several times and is still a bit murky. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
See In re Violation of Rule 28(D) (Fed Cir. 2011)(sanctions for redacting information that was not confidential including case citations). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Australia’s most-decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, lost his defamation case against three newspapers that accused him of war crimes in Afghanistan. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
This Agreement may be brought to an end by [Mexfield] by the exercise of the right of re-entry specified in this clause but ONLY in the following circumstances: a) If the rent reserved hereby or any part thereof shall at any time be in arrear and unpaid for 21 days … b) If [Ms Berrisford] shall at any time fail or neglect to perform or observe any of the [terms of] this Agreement which are to be performed and observed by [her] c) If [Ms Berrisford] shall cease to be a member of… [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
This Agreement may be brought to an end by [Mexfield] by the exercise of the right of re-entry specified in this clause but ONLY in the following circumstances: a) If the rent reserved hereby or any part thereof shall at any time be in arrear and unpaid for 21 days … b) If [Ms Berrisford] shall at any time fail or neglect to perform or observe any of the [terms of] this Agreement which are to be performed and observed by [her] c) If [Ms Berrisford] shall cease to be a member of… [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]