Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 2641 - 2660 of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm by Venkat
"] Washington Consumer Protection Act: Defendants argued that the complaint failed to adequately allege deceptiveness. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 1:09 am
  The judge did allow, however, that defendant may be liable under other civil and criminal laws. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Here is how the trial court correctly charged the jury under state law:If you determine that Hugh Benjamin was employed in a position sufficiently elevated within the corporate hierarchy as to be viewed as the employer’s alter ego, then you must also find Defendant Benjamin Enterprises strictly liable for hostile work environment sexual harassment under both federal and state law, and Defendant Michelle Benjamin strictly liable for hostile work… [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 3:45 am by Cross & Smith
Owner Did Not Know of Incompetence Owners cannot be held liable for negligent entrustment if they did not know (or could not reasonably have known) about the driver’s incompetence. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:46 am
The defendant's breach proximately caused Plaintiff's injury. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
As a result, the lien remained viable and the defendant was liable for the pre-sale assessments. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:16 am
This means that the plaintiff must prove that it is more probable than not that the defendant was liable. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 12:08 pm
  You can add an individual as the alter ego of a corporate defendant that was found liable pursuant to Section 187 of the CCP even if you didn't allege alter ego liability at trial. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by Jeff DeFrancisco
The trial court granted the defendant driver’s motion, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Cross & Smith
Punitive damages are meant to “punish” the liable defendant for particularly egregious or malicious conduct. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 8:39 am
For those landlords that brave the threats of property damage and noise complaints and allow pets, can such landlords be held liable when a tenant's pet attacks someone? [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 7:51 am by Eleonora Rosati
In both cases, the defendants themselves had rather ruled out that someone from their family had access to the internet at the time of the offence.In the third case, the BGH found that the higher regional court was allowed to use the defendants daughter’s confession. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:52 am
Donna Hogue, the plaintiff in the case, sued the defendants over the side effects linked to the generic version of the acid reflux drug Reglan. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:34 am by David DePaolo
Ergo, while Gregory's employer was liable to her under the state's workers' compensation scheme, the family that had retained her services could not be held liable in tort.Here's the story:Bernard Cott contracted with Gregory's employer in 2005 to get in-home care for his 85-year-old wife, Lorraine.Gregory had training and experience in Alzheimer's care.Bernard warned Gregory that Lorraine was combative and… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by David M. McLain
  Pursuant to Colorado’s pro rata statute, no defendant is liable for an amount greater than represented by the degree or percentage of fault or negligence attributable to such defendant. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:22 am by Larry Ribstein
  Plaintiff shareholders in the parent company, Janus Capital Group (JCG) argue in the Supreme Court that JCM should be liable as JIF’s manager for “mak[ing] an[] untrue statement of a material fact” in violation of Rule 10b-5 (and also that JCG should be liable as a control person). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:31 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
” In this case, the court concluded that the subjective knowledge of the contractors was irrelevant, and went on to reject the plaintiff’s claim that the contractors could be liable for her son’s death. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:31 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
” In this case, the court concluded that the subjective knowledge of the contractors was irrelevant, and went on to reject the plaintiff’s claim that the contractors could be liable for her son’s death. [read post]