Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 4,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
Music composers can create copyrightable compositions by equating the digits of the number "pi" (π) to musical notes, but they can't stop others from creating their own musical compositions based on pi's digits [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:37 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:08 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
and Cadbury Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
Judge Lucy Koh is doing some clean-up in the Apple v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:10 am
Brown states that the same video was downloaded twice -- one into a shared file and the other into an incomplete file, even though the video was fully downloaded and not incomplete. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:10 am
A musical interlude [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Do not consult your book or music publisher, as they hope you never read this article. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Do not consult your book or music publisher, as they hope you never read this article. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Do not consult your book or music publisher, as they hope you never read this article. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Do not consult your book or music publisher, as they hope you never read this article. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In Taradejna v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
The House Judiciary Committee will be holding a hearing on music licensing today at 11:30EST. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm
The Queen v Louis Riel / With an introduction by Desmond Morton. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:26 am
Ball State Univ. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:53 am
No. 198 v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:28 am
Elliott v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The Western District of Michigan aptly summarized what remains the current state of Michigan law:As a result of [M.C.L. [read post]
