Search for: "Mark May"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 64,935
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 4:38 am
The White House said the meeting was meant to mark Romania’s two decades as a NATO member. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:56 am
Mark Stevenson and María Verza report for AP News; Marina E. [read post]
14 May 2018, 10:36 am
Here in Massachusetts, MassBike is also presenting Bay State Bike Week from May 12th to May 20th. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:28 am
The Board, however, pointed out that "a term may be considered the identity of a person even if his or her name or likeness is not used. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:39 am
" The Board did not disagree that the two words may have different meanings. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:38 pm
If the disclaimer is inappropriate, it may or may not be worth the argument. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 3:06 am
As to customer sophistication, the prices of the involved goods and services would not suggest a high degree of purchaser care, but consumers may exercise some care vis-a-vis these personal goods. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:05 am
Lashion Robinson, Opposition No. 91265207 (May 18, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Martha B. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:21 am
PSBC Limited, Opposition No. 91267498 (May 15, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:27 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark LYKAN for athletic apparel, in view of the identical mark registered for watches and jewelry]. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:31 am
The PTO refused registration of the mark BATTLEFIELD BLUE 'RITA for "prepared alcoholic cocktail[s]" [BLUE disclaimed], finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark BATTLEFIELD for "beer." [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 5:30 am
They may prohibit an ex-employee from working with or accepting business from a group of clients. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:39 am
As such, it was claimed that the public may assume that the Applicant’s marks that follow a similar naming structure will be part of the same family of marks and, therefore, will be confused or deceived. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:14 am
The post Sheriff Isn't County Employee, so County May Release Report Investigating Him appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
To say this will be keenly watched is an understatement: it may be the most significant trade mark decision in the UK this century. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:30 am
Former CFO’s misguided tweets may leave company facing SEC action http://bit.ly/LoIIC0 via @BusInsRZolkos Gucci wins $4.7m damages over Guess infringement: Italian luxury label Gucci has won its trademark infringement … http://bit.ly/KBiU79 via @ipmagazine Canada’s Trade-marks Office now has a database for sound mark applications http://bit.ly/LqjLpD Louis Vuitton is most valuable luxury brand: Top 100 list http://zite.to/KNHYHx Megaupload’s Kim… [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:16 am
The WSJ Law Blog and Fortune's Legal Pad reported that the law firm Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins may be barred from serving as class counsel because it had purchased stolen company documents from a former Coke executive.After two Coke executives approached the firm with an offer of providing evidence, Coughlin Stoia hired them as consultants, one of whom then gave the firm over 3,000 documents taken from the company, including many marked confidential.The… [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
First, use must be made of trade marks sharing common elements, which consumers may regard as belonging to a family. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
The Patent Act essentially assigns the interest of the United State to private parties who may seek to enforce the false marking claim. 35 U.S.C. 292 states: (a) . . .Whoever marks upon, or affixes to . . . any unpatented article, the word "patent" or any word or number importing that the same is patented, for the purpose of deceiving the public. . .Shall be fined not more than $500 for every such offense. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
Although the relevant consumers of the involved products and services may exercise a high degree of care, the Board nonetheless affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark shown below left, for various computer related services, finding it likely to cause confusion with the registered mark shown below right, for computer design and development services and for software. [read post]
