Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2641 - 2660
of 21,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2021, 4:07 pm
December 1, 2020 marked the five-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s abrogation of Form 18—the model complaint that provided the minimum requirements for stating a claim of direct infringement. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am
Blackledge, 866 F.3d 169, 179 (3d Cir. 2017); see also Marks on behalf of SM, AM, and BM v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Freedom From Religion Foundation v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:42 am
(ADIR International, LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:57 am
Guarascio v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
District Court for the Central District of California recently issued a decision in the closely watched Patagonia, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
This decision marks the latest action in the ongoing efforts by EPA and states to regulate greenhouse gas emissions; particularly in terms of carbon emissions from currently existing power plants. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:34 am
The book came out before the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 6:22 pm
Footer, Kerry Senior, Mark van Dorp, Vincent Kiezebrink, Y. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:20 am
11Cir Affirms Convictions Of Army Veteran and Texas Lawyer For International Money Laundering, Mail, and Wire Fraud Conspiracies.United States of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:09 am
VIP PRODUCTS LLC (Opinion, United States Supreme Court) Agencies issue fina... [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:33 am
Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
BREAKING NEWS: Mark Janus, Petitioner, v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
In the case of Barth v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:30 am
United States). [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of CADG v Ryba [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
According to the Supreme Court, this approach is confirmed by the CJEU decision in the Budweiser case (Budějovický Budvar v Anheuser-Busch, case C-482/09), where the Court laid down that "the prerequisite for the running of [the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence is], first, registration of the later trade mark in the Member State concerned". [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION MARK S. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION MARK S. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 5:32 am
LLC v. [read post]
