Search for: "National Bank v. Case"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 5,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., et al., 2014 WL 4351411 (S.D. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
The grant of privilege was not discretionary (Three Rivers District Council and Others v The Governor and Company of the Bank of England [2004] UKHL 48), and confidentiality in itself was not sufficient to render a communication privileged. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:46 am
Inhibits a nation of tinkerers. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
It also mentioned the Voltage Pictures v John Doe decision of the Federal Court (the Teksavvy case, after the name of the ISP), giving a copyright content owner a limited right to customer data but restricting the uses that could be made of it and subjecting those uses to court supervision. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am
I mean all banking information – banks already have obligations of confidence, they have contractual remedies, they are subject to the Privacy Act and now the Privacy Commissioner has the power to give penalties. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Prior to Myriad, the US Supreme Court held in Mayo v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
Unresolved questions about Section 51.003 PLAINSCAPITAL BANK v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 8:34 pm
Let's send a message to Member States at the United Nations and wherever else folks are tackling surveillance law reform: surveillance law can no longer ignore our human rights. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
Elsewhere, PatLit notes the latest stage in the fascinating dispute between Vringo and ZTE over the "yes-it-is, no-it-isn't" patent infringement by sort-of-adhering to a technical standard, announces the British guidelines on the implementation of a Bolar-style defence to patent infringement claim for the benefit of researchers and explains a decision in which a US Federal Court sticks closely to the US Supreme Court's recent ruling on computer-implemented inventions in… [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
[v] The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
National Australia Bank, the Supreme Court articulated what seemed to be a bright-line test for determining the extent to which the U.S. securities laws apply to transactions with international elements. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am
Supreme Court held in Fifth Third Bank v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
The trial will be the first of its kind in the nation. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm
Bank of Scotland plc v Rea, McGeady, Laverty [2014] NIMaster 11 The borrowers’ cases were brought by NI Housing Rights Service, here is their account of the matter. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm
National Australia Bank, the Second Circuit declined to set forth a bright-line rule for determining when a securities fraud claim based on domestic transactions in foreign securities is sufficiently “domestic” to be subject to U.S. securities laws, thereby leaving the door open to future litigants to confront this issue in securities cases involving foreign elements. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
Human Rights to Culture, Family, and Self-Determination: The Case of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
Human Rights to Culture, Family, and Self-Determination: The Case of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
National Australia Bank. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:01 am
National Australia Bank held that Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5) could not be applied in an extraterritorial fashion. [read post]
