Search for: "People v J." Results 2641 - 2660 of 7,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 12:41 pm by Thomas Surmanski
Roy At paragraph 28 of the decision, Cromwell J., writing for the majority, cites an earlier case, R. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 17 November 2017 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Alsaifi v Trinity Mirror plc [2017] EWHC 2873. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant provided an update on the United States v. al-Nashiri proceedings. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In Lait v Evening Standard Limited [2010] EWHC 3239 (QB), a case concerned with the parliamentary expenses scandal, Eady J had to consider capable meanings. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
In Dowson v GMC [2015] EWHC 3379 at [49], Edis J held that professionals might be more scrupulous than the general public but remained undecided: [emphasis added] There was also no evidence that reasonable and honest doctors have any different view of what is required in the two particular situations where dishonesty was found than that held by reasonable and honest people. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Skorski, 2017 ONSC 6594 J R Henderson J awarded defamation damages of Can$10,000 to the plaintiff arising out of defamatory website publications concerning alleged financial irregularities at an old people’s home. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The duty is about protecting people from the poisonous and pernicious influence of extremist ideas that are used to legitimise terrorism. [read post]