Search for: "People v Long"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 19,528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 5:19 am
See Desert Palace, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:55 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Bose v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 8:58 am
In the previous post, V. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 8:59 am
See, U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
* People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Well, in all the years I have been writing this blog, people have complained that the Supreme Court, perhaps inadvertently, granted plan administrators too much power by authorizing the application of discretionary review so long as the plan’s authors remembered to grant that to them in the plan documents. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:16 pm
Long before the law of probabilities was articulated as such, practical people formulated certain common-sense conclusions about human behavior; jurors as factfinders are permitted to do the same - and [462 U.S. 213, 232] so are law enforcement officers. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 11:42 am
The crowd was simply too large, the line too long. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm
Ferguson (separate is equal); Lochner v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Some years ago – never mind how long precisely – having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on TV, I thought I would commence reading some patent judgments and see a bit of the workings of the law.Chief among my motives was the overwhelming idea of the great whale of a judgment itself. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm
But that’s just the way it is, and I think people should know that history—and it’s not that long ago. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm
Wrote the European Court of Human Rights in Case of A, B, and C v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
(For the long version, see the discussion of Gregg v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
However, the NLRB’s policies about employees’ use of social media are counterintuitive, and they cast a long shadow on employer activities. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:30 pm
(David Kopel) McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:49 am
Have got a long-term savings think about? [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
This means that the Trump administration has already started dismantling the Title X network by requiring compliance with the new rule, which has forced many long-time providers to leave the program. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:27 am
We must also ensure that people can afford to access the care they need by working to eliminate coverage bans like the Hyde Amendment that for far too long have pushed care out of reach for low-income people. [read post]
