Search for: "People v. Howes" Results 2641 - 2660 of 31,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2008, 10:59 am
Over on Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has posted a thoughtful and fair-minded response to our study of public interpretations of the Scott v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am by Patricia Hughes
In other words, it is not the state that is the nation (“Quebec is a nation”), but the people. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:52 am by Kyle Persaud
Citizen and Minor Child Accompanying/Following to Join) • L-2 (Dependents of Intracompany Transferees) • M (Vocational Students and Dependents) • N (Parents and Children of Certain People Who Have Been Granted Special Immigrant Status) • NATO-7 (Attendants, Servants, Personal Employees of NATO Representatives, Officials, Employees and Immediate Family Members) • O-3 (Dependents of Aliens With Extraordinary Ability and Their Assistants) … [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse wonders how, during the oral argument in Janus v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:04 am
Here it becomes more significant when coupled with a number of people pointing at the vehicles as if to say 'that's them.'" United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:19 pm by David Markus
"--Chief Justice Roberts to Howard Srebnick when the CJ was asking how a district court is to determine how much money should be used for a fee.I was able to travel to D.C. to sit in the Supreme Court and watch Howard make his argument in Luis v. [read post]