Search for: "People v. New" Results 2641 - 2660 of 41,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Usery (1976) – in particular, the anticommandeering cases such as New York v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm by Kurt R. Karst
By Philip Won & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —“Total Product Life Cycle Advisory Program or TAP pilot — the most exciting thing in MDUFA V. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am by Levin Papantonio
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Phil Dixon
The new law seems likely to be challenged as unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment and the cases interpreting Grady v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Acting on such beliefs, they seceded not only from the British Empire in 1776, but also from New York and New Hampshire to construct Vermont. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here) [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:52 am by Richard Hunt
A recent decision from the Northern District of New York has  a useful summary of the law of contribution and indemnity in Fair Housing Act cases. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:01 am by David Aaron
If the former President is convicted of one or more counts of Section 793(e), both sides will present examples of prior retention and disclosure sentences and reason by analogy, but United States v. [read post]