Search for: "S. C."
Results 2641 - 2660
of 142,055
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
Supreme Court Weighs New Bribery Case as More Clashes Are Brewing (Jan Wolfe & C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
Sun-Diamond Growers, a case with facts eerily reminiscent of those uncovered in recent Supreme Court ethics scandals, the justices significantly limited the reach of another public corruption law, the illegal gratuities statute, 18 USC § 201(c), in similar fashion. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
” G.S. 7B-2604(c). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:25 am
The Online Harms Act – otherwise known as Bill C-63 – is really at least three bills in one. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:10 am
It is also at odds with EUIPO’s practice not to examine all prior rights in oppositions or invalidity actions but to focus on “the most effective opposition, ground and bases” (Guidelines, Part C, §4.1). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:58 am
Cuando veo sentencias así, me maravilla el esfuerzo por cuadrar el círculo, pero más me sorprende que estas cuestiones no sea el propio legislador procesal, el que las remedie con norma legal (tan vivo en aprobar leyes para cosas tan perentorias, como por ejemplo, las costas en lo contencioso), en vez de dejarlo a esforzados remiendos judiciales, que como tales, no serán los últimos. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
Here’s what she had to say. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
Phyllis C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Canada On 8 April 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed a counterclaim brought under the Protection of Public Participation Act, S.B.C. 2019, c. 3 (the “PPPA”) in a nuisance and privacy claim relating to drone footage. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:30 am
The comments to Rule 7.1 admonishes lawyers not to make an “unsubstantiated comparison of the lawyer’s or law firm’s services with those of other lawyers or law firms. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:15 pm
Finally, the so-called sovereign coercion theories are placed in between.3 The contractual theory of the firm is based on an economic theory and on a seminal paper by Michael C. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
In such cases, the defendant is alleged to have breached a fiduciary duty to the issuer’s shareholders by the defendant’s use of this information for his own benefit. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm
In the case of A v A [2004] EWHC 142 (Fam)[Microsoft Word – 2004-EWHC-142 (thecustodyminefield.com)], the Judge included a schedule / footnote to his judgment setting out scenarios where (a) parent A can act unilaterally, (b) where parent A has a duty to consult parent B but does not need parent B’s consent, and (c) where both parent A and B must consent. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm
And finally, there's a little trial starting tomorrow in NYC. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
FG claimed that in failing to carry out the work in her expert’s surveyor’s report and in failing to make the physical changes recommended in her acoustic expert’s report (which would mean chnages to the flat below), as reasonable adaptations, RBKC had a) discriminated against FG, and continues to do so, within the meaning of sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 in the exercise of a function; and/orb) subjected FG to a detriment in the provision of… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Frey, 03 C 7948, 2005 WL 1139312, at *6 (N.D. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
A166011) 2024 WL 1320422, at *6–9 Exercise of Discretion Under Section 1385(c) Serrano argued that the trial court erred by failing to exercise its discretion under section 1385(c) to consider striking the jury’s premeditation and deliberation findings. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:26 am
Former first lady and Bouterse’s wife Ingrid Bouterse-Waldring told local reporters that she doesn’t know her husband’s location, but said that he won’t turn himself in to authorities, claiming that her husband’s trial is biased and politically motivated by the Dutch government. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
