Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:37 pm
The state court issued a protective order. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:28 am
That trend is one we hope and expect will continue, due in part to the effect of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Sitz and Delaware v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:31 am
Individual Inventor v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:05 pm
In general, larger sample sizes are better than smaller sample sizes. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Last week, the Ninth Circuit issued its new opinion, Wang v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:05 am
Sebelius) and Arizona’s immigration restrictions (United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:25 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
A method of analyzing a DNA sample that contains genetic material from at least two individuals to determine a probability distribution of genotype likelihood or weight in the sample, comprising the steps: (a) amplifying the DNA sample to produce an amplification product comprising DNA fragments, wherein each allele at a locus is amplified to generate relative amounts of DNA fragments of the alleles that are proportional to the relative amounts of template DNA from the… [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
United States Bureau of Prisons, 2013 U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:04 am
In yesterday’s post, I discussed Maryland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:04 am
In yesterday’s post, I discussed Maryland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 12:23 am
By Nicole KilloranState v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Maryland v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Using state law, they swabbed King's cheek to get a DNA sample, and then submitted the sample to the federal DNA database to see if there were any matches. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:18 am
Millennium Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
The Washington Supreme Court's decision in Bylsma v. [read post]
