Search for: "STATE v. WOODS" Results 2641 - 2660 of 3,002
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Salem State College 2nd Cir.o A Win for Working MothersChadwick v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:28 am
Currently, most ethanol in the United States is produced from domestically grown corn, and the rapid rise in the fuel's production and usage means that roughly one-quarter of all corn grown in the United States is now used to produce ethanol. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 10:24 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Wood, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 651 (02 April 2009) R. v Peacock & Anor [2009] EWCA Crim 654 (02 April 2009) Evans, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 650 (02 April 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Neufeld & Anor [2009] EWCA [...] [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
  After all, they have such nice new wood-paneled courtrooms in Foley Square, and they really aren't set up for a mass of state court defendants putting their feet up on the mahogany tables. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:31 pm
This up-to-date analysis includes: A practical explanation of Section 468B settlement funds; When and how to use them; Statutory and regulatory background for designated settlement funds (DSFs) and qualified settlement funds (QSFs); Discussion of the Tenth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:47 am
Trent Taylor, a partner with McGuire Woods, has published "State of North Carolina v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]