Search for: "Shields, in Re"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 4,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2014, 7:03 am
MacIver Institute for Public Policy & The Texas Public Policy Foundation, October 23, 2013 State Trends Legislative Victories from 2011-2013 Removing Youth from the Adult Criminal Justice System, Campaign for Youth Justice, October 2013 "Sixteen States Have Shielded More Juveniles from Adult System Since 2011," Chronicle of Social Change, October 10, 2013March 26thHouse Select Committee on Criminal Procedure ReformTopic: Paperless charging system for processing criminal cases … [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
Oyama: a large number are internationally based, but it’s a mixture.Q for Schneider: what would you like to say to college students who think you’re driving a limo? [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:37 pm
The court granted re-argument but adhered to its original decision. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Of course, that’s not all that happened in the news this week: We’re monitoring a recently-filed lawsuit by AK Steel Corp., alleging that its former employee, Thomas Miskovich, violated his noncompete contract and tortiously interfered with AK Steel’s business when he jumped ship for Novelis Corp. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:29 am
The first article is written by Justine Nolan who writes that we are currently witnessing a process of re-regulation whereby state and non-state actors are utilizing a combination of public and private regulation to improve the framework for corporate rights compliance. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:25 am
It’s a shame we’re still so far from understanding equality in this country that those signs couldn’t simply say “Bad4Us. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:28 am
We’re deeply disappointed by the court’s decision to dismiss the case. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
We reject, however, the appellant’s additional contentions that tribal sovereign immunity shielded it from subpoena and that the subpoena was unreasonably broad in scope. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:59 am
While you’re pondering that, consider what Tom Shields of the Michigan Insurance Coalition told Kathy Gray of the Detroit Free Press about the promised savings in Speaker Bolger’s No Fault plan: “‘Despite our support for the positive ideas the speaker has put together, we continue to oppose government-mandated rollbacks in a free market system. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:48 pm
Durham refuses to say.The Grand JuryThe city cites North Carolina law to shield Gottlieb and Himan from any misleading testimony they might have given to the grand jury—a reminder of how the grand jury process, at least in North Carolina, not only fails to protect innocent defendants, but actually harms them.Durham further claims that “the prosecution of Plaintiffs was supported by probable cause. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
With this in mind, it will not be necessary for you to re-title assets already held by the trust or to provide copies of the new governing document to financial institutions. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Indeed, after Atigeo declined to provide investment capital, the Defendant “threatened, “if you’re not with me, you’re against me” and left [Atigeo’s CEO] with the warning that others who had crossed him had “learned the hard way. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Indeed, after Atigeo declined to provide investment capital, the Defendant “threatened, “if you’re not with me, you’re against me” and left [Atigeo’s CEO] with the warning that others who had crossed him had “learned the hard way. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Indeed, after Atigeo declined to provide investment capital, the Defendant “threatened, “if you’re not with me, you’re against me” and left [Atigeo’s CEO] with the warning that others who had crossed him had “learned the hard way. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Finally, the court says that even if this isn’t the precise legal outcome, qualified immunity shields the chief’s decision. __ This case is pretty much a continuation of cases involving a bunch of different imprudent content postings by employees, especially those working for the government. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
The Court of Appeals’ contrary analysis rests on its misreading of In re Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Now that the President is a lame duck, and can’t care about re-election, it sure would be nice to hear him putting the facts of clergy abuse out there as well. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:26 pm
In other words, “we’re digging as fast as we can. [read post]
