Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 2641 - 2660 of 3,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) reasonably interpreted, and properly applied, the legal standard used for making collective bargaining-unit determinations, in a case about whether the NLRB properly certified as a collective-bargaining unit a group of FedEx drivers at a New Jersey shipping facility, without including the facility’s dockworkers. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking,… [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Hendricks, Ainsley Weston, “Silicosis Mortality Trends and New Exposures to Respirable Crystalline Silica — United States, 2001–2010,&r [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
The second allegedly defamatory statement identified in the complaint states: Gayla Nesgoda they only truly have one United States location, in New Jersey. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
Similar legislation has also been proposed in New York State, both before and since 2018, with an active bill currently in the state Senate. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
  New Jersey lawyer Carl Gelman retained Dr. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:20 pm by Bill Marler
Hepatitis A infections among food handlers in the United States, 1993–2011. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:38 am by Craig Livermore
 For example, the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 20 Abbott v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Kemp
The Facts and Arguments of United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:35 am by Katherine Scanlon
Coventry contended that the Florida Viatical Settlements act, in as much as it purported to allow the Office authority over transactions occurring outside of Florida, violated the Dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]