Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2641 - 2660 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm by Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro
Levy Center for Constitutional Studies and author of Supreme Disorder: Judicial Nominations and the Politics of America’s Highest Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Rounds, 530 F.3d 724, 732 (8th Cir. 2008): 1) plaintiff was likely to prove any interest the state has in protecting funeral mourners from unwanted speech was outweighed by the First Amendment right to free speech; [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
The Defendants state that the Agreement was "intentionally not docketed. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
” Rather, relying on the D.C. district court’s Graves v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
First, he gave little weight to the state’s contention that the maps that the challengers offered fell short because they failed to keep the Gulf Coast region, in the southwest part of the state, in the same district. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
(You may choose to read the whole brief, but the argument I am talking about begins on page 9 and runs to page 15.)Let us now see how this unfortunate departure from neutral principles lands the Second District Court of Appeals in a welter of contradictions.After reviewing the history of church property cases in the United States Supreme Court, and fleshing out what that Court meant by the term "neutral principles", the Texas Court of… [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
(You may choose to read the whole brief, but the argument I am talking about begins on page 9 and runs to page 15.)Let us now see how this unfortunate departure from neutral principles lands the Second District Court of Appeals in a welter of contradictions.After reviewing the history of church property cases in the United States Supreme Court, and fleshing out what that Court meant by the term "neutral principles", the Texas Court of… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:08 pm
In determining Hertz's citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, the District Court applied the precedent of the Ninth Circuit by using the "business activity" test, which instructed courts to identify a corporation's "principal place of business" by first determining the amount of a corporation's business activity state by state. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision in 1977 by a 2-1 margin, with each judge writing separate opinions. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm by cdw
“[D]ocuments prepared by court personnel in connection with court cases and maintained by the court are judicial documents governed by GR 15. [read post]