Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 32,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit affirmed, holding that exempting Groff from work on Sundays imposed a more than de minimis cost on USPS because it forced his coworkers to pick up more than their share of Sunday shifts. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Dykes v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
Halkbank relies on Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
These provisions of Texas' self-defense laws generally track the laws in other U.S. states. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:56 pm
ShareFrom the beginning of Monday’s oral argument in Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Public sector employees are entitled to relief similar to the relief offered under the Congressional Accountability Act, Title V of the United States Code, and the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:43 am
A Code of Practice has “statutory force”, meaning that the ICO must take it into account in respect of any of its enforcement activities. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Hogan, defendants in both federal and state criminal cases may plead the fifth. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
In the recent West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:22 am
Accordingly, CRTF recommends that government agencies and CII owners notify the CSA and Singapore Police Force immediately in the event of a ransomware attack before any ransom payment is made. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Pub does not re-open following COVID-19 In Fanzone v. 516400 B.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Pub does not re-open following COVID-19 In Fanzone v. 516400 B.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
For the other, human rights is the term that invokes the natural responsibility of the leading forces of the human collective to establish orders of stability and prosperity based on collective development through which individual welfare may be enhanced. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:06 pm
§ 1983 whenever they are federally cross-deputized as members of joint state-federal task forces. [read post]
