Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
The beginning of state intervention The Clandestine Marriages Act 1753 (Lord Hardwicke’s Act) put all that Canon Law onto a statutory basis. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am
The House of Lords debated Lord Clement Jones’s Private Members Bill, which aims to set out a legislative framework for the responsible use of algorithmic and automated decision-making systems in the public sector. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:11 am
Such an approach is also supported by a decision of the House of Lords in Clark v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
In this connection, a recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 1:11 pm
That’s the issue in Grzyb v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:51 am
Yesterday, at [2009] EWCA Civ 750, the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Mummery, Lloyd and Moore-Bick) dismissed the appeal against the trial judge's decision. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
R (on the Application of AC) v Bershire West Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 247 – Read judgment. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:16 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
On Friday the Court of Appeal (Lady Justice Arden and Lords Justices Floyd and Bean) allowed the appeal, Floyd LJ delivering a single judgment with which the others concurred. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms of the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
Raelian spokesperson, put the capstone on today’s events:Roehr said the Vatican enjoys observer status in the United Nations because it is wrongly recognized as a state, and that this status has been protecting the pope and Vatican officials in most countries under diplomatic immunity agreements. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:35 pm
v=Y4MnpzG5Sqc), is a 30 minute long video calling attention to one of the world’s worst war criminals, Joseph Kony. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:24 am
Kelter v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Sapkota v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Court of Appeal case about segregation of immigration decisions – by the Free Movement Blog. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
The nature of the bar The House of Lords in Derbyshire CC v Times Newspapers Ltd ([1993] AC 534), decided that a local authority should not be able to sue in defamation. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
One of the best known examples of this point of view was that advanced by Lord Woolf in A v B plc [2003] QB 195, (the Gary Flitcroft case), in which he argued that ‘any interference with the press has to be justified because it inevitably has some effect on the ability of the press to perform its role in society. [read post]
