Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2016, 1:30 pm
Zihang Liu has posted The Prosecutor v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Armitage v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 9:52 am
Carter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
Supreme Court opinion in Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 7:02 am
The case, Knoderer v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Steak n Shake asserts that the Steak n Shake trademarks, and the products and services offered in association with those marks, have been extensively promoted throughout the United States for many years. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:40 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
Earlier coverage of Maples v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Lukasz first reviewed the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost, on the extent to which injunctive relief, granted in the court of one EU Member States, should or must extend to the entire extent of the EU? [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:11 am
See Wiley v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
Zall v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 2:53 am
B & B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
While governance of the European patent system continues to preoccupy many of us, MARQUES -- the European trade mark organisation -- has just fired off a salvo or two of its own in the direction of the effective functioning of the parallel trade mark systems for the Community trade mark and national or regional marks within EU Member States. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:01 pm
Merrill v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Hearst Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 6:00 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Parallel Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
In a guest post, Mark Hill looks at an interesting judgment from Uganda on the limits of the secular courts’ jurisdiction over the internal affairs of Churches. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:45 am
Baze v. [read post]
