Search for: "State v. Selle" Results 2641 - 2660 of 14,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 10:33 am by Steve Statsinger
United States v. al Kassar, No. 09-1051-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:17 am by gmlevine
The Complainant in Streetwise Maps located in the United States (Florida) alleges that Respondent (located in the U.K.) is a competitor in the market it serves. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:24 am
  The interim policy will apply retroactively to all baseload power plants that have sought permits since April 2007 (when the US Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
IB further asserted that Dillard, shortly after funding the account, began a trading strategy that consisted of buying and selling mining company stocks and oil and mineral futures. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
Regardless of the outcome of the case between Capitol Records and ReDigi (Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The bottom line: The Commissioner held that Education Law §310 provides no basis to review an alleged act or omission by the DCCE or by the BOR or its members. * Deaccession is the official removing of an item from a public library, museum, or art gallery in order to sell it or otherwise dispose of it. ** See Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Rome v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The bottom line: The Commissioner held that Education Law §310 provides no basis to review an alleged act or omission by the DCCE or by the BOR or its members. * Deaccession is the official removing of an item from a public library, museum, or art gallery in order to sell it or otherwise dispose of it. ** See Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Rome v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:57 am by WIMS
Rather, we are led to our conclusion principally by an expansive gloss on the preemptive scope of the AEA first set forth in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]