Search for: "State v. Vanness" Results 2641 - 2660 of 3,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2010, 9:21 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
The Court of Justice in its recent judgment of 6 October 2009, ICF v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Summer Zervos, a former contestant of The Apprentice has presented evidence in court filings to support her claims that the President Trump sexually assaulted her in a hotel room in 2007. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
If you've ever studied partnerships or limited liability companies, chances are you know of Professor Larry Ribstein, the Mildred Van Voorhis Jones Chair in Law at the University of Illinois College of Law. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
Well, we all missed a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decision -- quite a big one and an unusual one too -- Case C‑661/11, Martin Y Paz Diffusion SA v David Depuydt, Fabriek van Maroquinerie Gauquie NV, a ruling of the Third Chamber of Europe's favourite court that dates all the way back to 19 September. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 11:55 am by Ben
This brief also asks for remand for a new trial, including striking the bill of costs.Copykat will issue updates as and when they come.By Alf van Beem (Own work), via Wikimedia CommonsCompulsory Licences for “cable systems” do not apply to TV streamersThe 9th Circuit delivered its ruling in the Fox Television Stations v Aereokiller case on 21 March. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm
In MP and NT (Sri Lanka) v SSHD [2014] EWCA Civ 829, the Court of Appeal found that the UKUT had adequately justified its adoption of a more restrictive (‘less generous’) standard for who would be at risk upon return to Sri Lanka than that of by the UNHCR. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted Apple an extension until July 15 for its final brief, which in formal terms is only supposed to reinforce Apple's appeal of Epic's consolation prize from the district court (an injunction under California Unfair Competition Law) but which Apple will try to use in order to make some final points even on the more important issues in the case.There are two reasons for which Epic lost (apart from the aforementioned… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
The prior McCreary case was decided by a 5-4 vote of the Justices on June 27, 2005 — the same day that the Court, in another case (Van Orden v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Cathérine Van de Graaf, Strasbourg Observers: Banning body-covering swimwear: the Human Rights Centre submitted a Third Party Intervention to the ECtHR in Missaoui and Akhandaf v Belgium: on yet another pending case on burkinis. [read post]