Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 3,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
United States (Case No. 11-318 (Court of Claims)). [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 6:08 am
The United States later initiated this criminal prosecution. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:43 am
The United States later initiated this criminal prosecution. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:45 am
Carlos Manuel Vazquez and Stephen I. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:12 am
(U.S. 2012) (previously discussed on LEXVIVO) the United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded the July 29, 2011, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") decision, The Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Bar and the State Bar of New York. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
”Here is the full opinion of the court: United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
Civilian’s role within the military unit (e.g. appellant is a 10; Stephen Colbert would be a 0). 3. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:55 am
Supreme Court victory on March 28, in a complex immigration case involving a permanent resident of the United States facing deportation. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:05 am
As I noted when FCC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:17 am
Shortly after the USAID announcement, David Wolman, author of a new book titled, The End of Money, appeared on numerous radio talk shows throughout the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:17 am
Specifically, for “intentional or willful” violations, the United States is liable for “actual damages. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Heejn Lim v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
United States, No. 10-7387. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:40 pm
The case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
