Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2014, 10:05 am
The article provides an easy to read round up of U.S. copyright laws, and asks whether the digital era will lead to changes in copyright. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
Dryer v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
Rogers v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Perhaps there should be case for sui generis protection to avoid land grab.RT: Judge Leval’s claims in J&J v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
The definition of property is what’s up for debate. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
The Federal Constitutional Court shall rule on the question ofunconstitutionality.(3) Details shall be regulated by federal laws.* * * Article 23 [European Union – Protection of basic rights –Principle of subsidiarity](1) With a view to establishing a united Eur [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:49 am
Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:49 am
Moreover, the term was used in everyday parlance to denote that type of racing, predating both the establishment of the FIA Formula One World Championship and Formula One’s use of the term.The Hearing Officer held that the competing goods were identical based on the principle enunciated in Case T-133/05 Gérard Meric v OHIM, [which the IPKat couldn't find on the Curia database, searching both by name and by case number. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:25 pm
” It also can set up a market where consumers can choose among low-price and low-service brands, high-price and high-service brands, and everything in between. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 6:56 am
As it happens, there's a proceeding now in front of the DC Circuit involving forbearance - Verizon and AT&T v FCC - involving the FCC's continued enforcement of various accounting rules and requirements on certain telephone service providers (but not others); plaintiffs are asserting that the rules, which were adopted decades ago, when the FCC was in the telephone-rate-setting business, are no longer consistent with the public interest now that Ma Bell has… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:05 pm
But under the statute, the seven-figure cost of that regulation also indisputably is borne largely by consumers outside of this locality. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:03 am
So utilitarians end up either indeterminate or guessing. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Further along the native ad spectrum are “In-Ad” and “Custom/Can’t be Contained. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
When Noel Canning v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
By now, we’ve all heard about the Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/mwWyg2HtjZ -> Google Settles With FTC Over In-App Purchases Dispute http://t.co/pWEmHlWhwb -> Weight loss firm demands $1 million from website hosting negative reviews http://t.co/59u9VFS2SI -> Patent troll gives up, can’t defend “matchmaking” patent under new law http://t.co/VYC8GYPJFz -> Distinguishing between cyberlockers and legitimate cloud storage services http://t.co/rzr9dXLyG3 -> Bitcoin accepted here? [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
But that's not what the the law in Ohio says.In other words, car dealers like Autos Direct not only wanted you to not be able to go into a courtroom where the public can find out what they did to you, but they also didn't want you to be able to use consumer protection laws against them at all. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:46 am
But that's not what the the law in Ohio says.In other words, car dealers like Autos Direct not only wanted you to not be able to go into a courtroom where the public can find out what they did to you, but they also didn't want you to be able to use consumer protection laws against them at all. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:46 am
But that's not what the the law in Ohio says.In other words, car dealers like Autos Direct not only wanted you to not be able to go into a courtroom where the public can find out what they did to you, but they also didn't want you to be able to use consumer protection laws against them at all. [read post]
