Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,third Circuit" Results 2641 - 2660 of 6,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 7:50 pm by FDABlog HPM
  FTC appealed, and in October 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the case to the district court for reconsideration of the substantiation issue. [read post]
  The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
United States of America, — F.3d —-, 2011 WL 5865225 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:16 pm by Karina Fuentes
         The detention and search of a vessel on international waters and the Fourth Amendment implications of that stop and search were addressed by the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:54 pm by John Floyd
  On appeal, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled the trial court’s ruling on the forfeiture issue, finding that Terry was “jointly and severally liable” for the total money judgment. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:54 pm by John Floyd
  On appeal, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled the trial court’s ruling on the forfeiture issue, finding that Terry was “jointly and severally liable” for the total money judgment. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am by Florian Mueller
Some interesting appeals already started in 2012, but this year we're going to see high-impact rulings.There's still quite some activity in district court (in the United States and in other jurisdictions) and (much less than in the past as far as disputes between two big parties are concerned) at the ITC. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In response to questions certified to [it] by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, [the New York State Court of Appeals concluded] that Yard-Man-type inferences favoring such vesting are likewise inconsistent with New York's established contract interpretation principles. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:46 am
Aug. 11, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that certain allegedly misleading statements regarding the pricing of insurance premiums by a large health insurance company were protected under the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
On appeal, the Tenth Circuit upheld the district court as to most points. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:45 am by John T. McDonald
Plaintiffs appealed to the federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which then certified the following question of law to the NJ High Court: what test applies in determining employment status for purposes of New Jersey’s [WPL] and [WHL]? [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
On appeal, Setser argued unsuccessfully that the district court lacked authority to make a concurrent/consecutive decision relative to a state sentence that had not yet been imposed. [read post]