Search for: "United States v. District Court"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 34,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:09 am
SENTENCING United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 10:38 am
On October 1, 2024, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:47 am
On May 19, 2011, the Second District (Division 1) in Archer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 11:57 am
Sotokin of the United States District Court District of Massachusetts believed the administration’s arguments were flawed and pointed to the landmark decision in Wong Kim Ark (1898). [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 9:07 am
The district court granted the government defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and this appeal followed. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:09 pm
Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:35 am
In the first of three filed actions, United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:54 am
United States, 466 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1972). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:56 am
And because the States lack Article III standing, the District Court did not have jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
Cal, March 15, 2016), was decided by United States District Judge Vince Chhabria. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:06 pm
Office of Personnel Management, Judge Vanessa Bryant of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut found Section 3 of DOMA to violate equal protection. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
Brooks, No. 4:09cv86 in the Newport News Division of United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 5:35 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 23 (Dec. 19, 2006) on the case S.J. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:54 am
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court held that Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act requires a court to stay a proceeding pending arbitration and provides no discretion for the court to dismiss the action. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:29 pm
Mitze v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 7:46 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), as well as Wiener v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 pm
After the United States Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
