Search for: "Wall v. Wall" Results 2641 - 2660 of 11,498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2019, 2:48 pm by Giles Peaker
Blue Manchester Ltd v North West Ground Rents Ltd [2019] EWHC 142 (TCC) I’m not going to go into great detail on this case, despite its various enticing complications – an iconic new Manchester building (pictured above), Carillion (the contractor on construction) going into receivership, and the idiosyncratic view of the Manchester weather of HHJ Davies, sitting as a High Court judge: “It is also because its external elevations are fully glazed, the façades being… [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:54 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer http://www.rrbdlaw.com/4480/securities-industry-commentator/SEC Charges Volkswagen, Former CEO With Defrauding Bond Investors During "Clean Diesel" Emissions Fraud (SEC Release)In the Matter of Allan Michael Roth (SEC Order Denying Respondent's Motion to Postpone Filing Answer Indefinitely)Good Intentions Pave Merrill Lynch Stockbroker's Retirement… [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
SCOTUS Resolves Court Split in Fourth Estate, but Registration Concerns Remain — I wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit v Wall-Street.com, which it issued on Monday, and its significance for Copyright Office modernization efforts. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Stancarone v DiNapoli, 161 AD3d 144, the court then explained that "To be deemed accidental, an injury must not have been the result of activities undertaken in the ordinary course of [the employee's] job duties but, rather, must be due to a precipitating accidental event [that] is not a risk of the work performed. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Stancarone v DiNapoli, 161 AD3d 144, the court then explained that "To be deemed accidental, an injury must not have been the result of activities undertaken in the ordinary course of [the employee's] job duties but, rather, must be due to a precipitating accidental event [that] is not a risk of the work performed. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Suja Thomas writes that in Timbs v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 10:55 am by Audrey A Millemann
  However, in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:03 am by Scott Harman
Sarah Grant summarized the oral argument in Force v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:18 am by Kevin Milewski
This Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Leah Litman considers how the issues in Gundy v. [read post]