Search for: "Wells v. Place" Results 2641 - 2660 of 31,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The summer of our discontents Two months ago, if you prompted Version 3 of the AI-art generator MidJourney to generate depictions of an “otter on a plane using wifi,” you were rewarded with the nonsense in the left panel of our lead graphic. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
The more mundane “Torch off” work equally well though! [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
One cannot answer that question strictly as a matter of public policy because the First Amendment right to free speech places limits on government’s power to make lying a crime.In United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 10:16 am by Giles Peaker
What enforcement might follow once the new powers are in place (and the issue is out of the spotlight) will have to be seen. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Daniel may have placed the firearm in the bag” (para. 28 (footnote omitted)). [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The burden of proof was considered to be “a very substantial hurdle” which the claimants had “fallen well short of surmounting it”. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am by Orin S. Kerr
  So my reworked materials start with a section on the history and the development of the Fourth Amendment, starting with Entick v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
As a general rule, the wage determination incorporated into a bid solicitation and related contract award establishes the minimum wage rates and fringe benefits that must be paid for the entire term of the contract.[3]  Does paying prevailing wages mean that a developer might as well sign up a Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”)? [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
LSO v Widz[1] In Law Society of Ontario v Widz, 2022 ONLSTH 140, the issue was the penalty for a lawyer’s abuse of his partner. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 11:20 am by Aaron Moss
As I explained in my 2020 worst-of list, this case never should have gone to a jury in the first place. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:02 am by Michaela Ring (Hoffmann Eitle)
Urt. v. 2.6.2022 – 6 U 40/22, GRUR-RS 2022, 22858   The trade mark owner claimed that his trade mark rights had been infringed, and he applied for injunctive remedies. [read post]