Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 61,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 9:12 pm
The Nebraska supreme court reverses, ordering the law firm to prove that its fee was reasonable,Hauptman, O'Brien v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
United States, No. 18-1851 C (Ct. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 1:30 pm
Illinois’ and Vermont’s bills both recognize abortion and other reproductive rights as “fundamental,” ensuring that they will remain protected in those states, regardless of what happens to Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:29 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:41 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:24 pm
In Young v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 7:18 pm
In Montgomery v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:53 am
Goranowski v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of the Department of Finance and Director of the Department of Personnel Administration shall work with the State Controller to develop and implement the necessary mechanisms, including but not limited to pay letters and computer programs, to comply with the California Supreme Court's White v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:58 am
SepperZubik v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:15 am
Futrell v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
There’s a good argument that designing an app to work better in a state once it knows the user’s location necessarily means that the app is purposely directed to that state. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
If Salim v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:09 am
Appeal Board) v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2010 NY Slip Op 01854, Decided on March 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn May 1991 Cynthia T. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
On November 28, 2018, oral argument was heard in Tyson Tibbs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
In a recent decision, Ramirez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
In a recent decision, Ramirez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
