Search for: "X, Y " Results 2641 - 2660 of 4,307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2011, 5:30 am by Donna
If the offer says you will be employed from x-date to y-date, then you should get paid out for the length of the employment. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Rita Handrich
In the most recent issue of The Jury Expert, we have an article updating all of us on Generation X today. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:17 pm by chabbe
hola disculpa lo ke pasa es ke yo pedi un creditoen banamex me lo autorizaron por 8000 pk gano 5000 x mes..pero resulta qe voy despues de unos 4 meses y cheko mi cuenta y tengo 350000 que yo nunca pedi pense que era un premio o un error de ded mi error fue sacarlo ya hora me piden una cantidad quincenal que no tengo que puedo hacer si no kieren negociar?? [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:31 am by Above the Law
If the recruiter cannot represent to the firm that they have discussed the opening with you and that you are specifically interested because of X,Y, and Z, then your application will not have as much credibility with the firm. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:18 am by Jeffrey W. Berkman, Esq.
., regular mail, certified with return receipt, fax, email, overnight, personal delivery) and when delivery is deemed to have taken place (regular mail:  "x" days after mailing in the US or "y" days outside the US; fax:  upon confirmation of successful transmission; overnight mail:  upon proof of delivery; and personal delivery:  upon proof of personal… [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by WIMS
And these weren't kind of casual, you know, we'll think about doing X, Y or Z. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 6:27 am by Ron A. Bouchard
The X axis in both panels represents the innovation index data. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:10 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) R v A Local Authority & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1451 (06 December 2011) Leeds Group Plc v Leeds City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1447 (02 December 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Farnon v Devonshires Solicitors (a firm) [2011] EWHC 3167 (QB) (06 December 2011) McKay (t/a Mckay Law Solicitors And Advocates) v Centurion Credit Resources LLC [2011] EWHC 3198 (QB) (06 December 2011) High Court (Family Division) X And Y (Children), Re… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:05 am by Ken Lammers
"I understand you're trying to make an argument that he won't be reformed in jail and maybe you have alternatives X, Y, & Z in mind that you're going to try to sell me on next, but you've already set my state of mind and there's a high probability that you've scuttled the rest of your argument.BUT, but, you say, I've heard well respected, long-time practitioner John Smith Esq. say the same things to you, Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:45 pm by dave
After explaining his hourly rate he then began to further refine his comments by saying “but I don’t charge you for time spent on X, Y and Z. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:51 pm by Art Hinshaw
This is out of context and in no particular order: Caucus is the refuge of cowards there are no ideological virgins I know we’re talking about author X’s paper, but I really want to comment about author Y’s paper instead Immediately afterwards from Author X – I want to comment on author Y’s paper too. [...] [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
" They are not finding that x caused y; at best they are finding that x perhaps caused y, or that it is not completely impossible that x caused y, or something along those lines. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:06 pm by Ken
Imagine this scenario, based on an actual situation: A business associate calls you and says, “my dear business associate, the shit has hit the fan; Federal Agency X is investigating Project Y we did together. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by jpfaff
" They are not finding that x caused y; at best they are finding that x perhaps caused y, or that it is not completely impossible that x caused y, or something along those lines. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:14 am by José Guillermo
"que destruyan dos y conserven dos", me gustaría preguntarle a ese señor, lo siguiente, Si en su casa viven 20 personas y tiene 4 baños, le agradaría que le destruyeran dos a cambio de "X soles" y bueno no continuo con las consecuencias pues son obvias. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:08 am by war
The location of the second touch point is then compared with the locations of the X and Y channels previously generated by the first touch. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm by travisian
hola mi caso es ese: mi esposo contrato un plan mas x menos 3 en telcel y x problemas economicos dejo de pagar 2 meses la deuda era de 900.00 y estuvieron llamando a casa de mi mama diciendo que debia 4000 que xq debia 4 meses..para esto anteriormente le llamaron de un callcenter llamado DIGITAL SHOP en la condesa..diciendo que como tenia ya 7 meses con su equipo podia sacar otro plan y de obsequio iva otro cel...al principio el si se animo pero despues… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm by yayiz
hola a todos mi problema es el siguiente hace alrededor de 2 años sake un pretamo por la cantidada de 4000 pague la mita y despues x motivos personales me atrase y hoy me llego una demanda de un despacho juridico que si para el 30 de noviembre no liquido la cantidada de 6,737.29 de el dia 1 al 7 de diciembre me vana embargar la cantidad de 29,644.53 ayuda estoy desesperada nada de lo que esta en la casa es mio es de mis padres [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:29 pm
In modern American society, we tend to conflate observations with judgments and feelings, and we tend to deny responsibility of our own feelings when we say things like we “should do x, y, z" or “we have to. [read post]