Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 191,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2010, 2:30 am
Threlfall v Hull City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1147; [2010] WLR (D) 262 “In cases where an employee had been provided with equipment to use in his employment, but injury had occurred and the question arose whether such ‘personal protective equipment’ had been ‘suitable’ for regulatory purposes and issues of negligence, regard was to be given to both regs 4 and 6 of the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992; and the concept of… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:51 am
Whitehead and another v Hibbert Pownall & Newton ( a firm); [2008] WLR (D) 96 “Solicitors who had negligently failed to prosecute a claim for damages for clinical negligence, including a claim for future loss, with the result that the claim had been set down at the date of the original claimant's death were not liable for failing to secure for the deceased's estate what, on the full facts, would have amounted a an uncovenanted windfall. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:53 am
With DNA evidence having become the gold standard in criminal proceedings, enabling law enforcement personnel to bring cases like the King rape case that otherwise might never have been solved, King v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm
In their review of the articles, state parties will have to acknowledge the invocation of Articles V and VI. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:04 pm
While there are many reasons for the slow nature of civil litigation, more can be done by attorneys and courts to streamline litigation to make it less burdensome on the parties.Related posts: FLOORgraphics' Suit Against News America Set for Trial October 1; Summary Judgment Motion Denied in FGI v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:29 am
Professor Wood seems to have been caught in a rather unsuccessful attempt at... [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:44 am
Peña v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
This book – a major contribution to understanding theory and practice related to the public policy exception – provides a comprehensive understanding on how the term ‘public policy’ specified in Article V of the New York Convention has been interpreted and applied by the Chinese courts. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:37 pm
§ 271(e)(2) with a generic challenger) have been a thorn in the side of the Federal Trade Commission for several years. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:05 pm
In Sharma v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:56 pm
So, while Jensen could have been a turning point in the Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence, it instead resides in constitutional law obscurity. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
In Lyng v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am
The post Flowers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
KnoxHammer v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Noel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:51 am
A new petitioners’ brief has been added to the case page for Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 1:02 pm
As one of you has noted, our favorite pro se lawsuit, filed back in 2003, has already been decided. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Kent the other day, we've been thinking about what's at stake. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:04 pm
The SG's invitation brief in No. 06-273, Cox v. [read post]
