Search for: "BELLE v. STATE" Results 2661 - 2680 of 2,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm by Howard Knopf
Unlike United States works, there is no requirement for the foreign works to have been registered in the US Copyright Office. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica)   [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:08 pm by Jeff Sovern
In that decision, the Court extended the “plausibility test” first introduced two years earlier, in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
As a result, HDOH ordered this product embargoed (not to be sold, purchased, or consumed) throughout the state, and the temporary closure of all Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  It’s instinctive, like when Pavlov’s dogs heard that bell. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
The Court stated as follows: What determines when allurement/enticement should apply? [read post]