Search for: "Bull v. Bull" Results 2661 - 2680 of 3,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2007, 12:15 am
 Maybe with a logo of a snarling pit bull? [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:44 am by Rick Hasen
In a comprehensive and careful 151-page opinion, a federal district court in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
 It is possible to identify three areas of current interest in relation to the control of cognition to advance the interests and aspiration of ideologically driven human collectives. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
 The 9th Circuit’s most famous right of publicity case is White v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judgesNever Too Late 203 [Weeks ending 14 and 21 Oct] Does FEYONCÉ blur BEYONCÉ's distinctiveness? [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:22 am
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L’HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTSPALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLANDwww.ohchr.org  TEL:  +41 22 917 9159 FAX:  +41 22 917 9006 E-MAIL:  srenvironment@ohchr.orgMandate of the Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment                             … [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Elena Kagan and Alan Rozenshtein analyzed the five-hour Thompson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
 A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in theHigh Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by Ben
This arrangement will allow music fans to enjoy our music on Pandora while protecting our songwriters and composers".The Conan Doyle Estate Ltd., owned and run by the family of writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, has appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals from the lower court decision in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate Ltd. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am by velvel
The amounts allowable to Picard at a top level of three percent of the amount he distributes, would be obscene. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
.' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
The matter is part heard On 25 to 28 March 2019 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the defamation case of Bull v Desporte. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 11:13 am by Cyberleagle
Eady J said of that provision: “In order to be able to characterise something as ‘unlawful’ a person would need to know something of the strength or weakness of available defences” (Bunt v Tilley). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
”  This devotion to detail reaches an apogee in State v. [read post]