Search for: "CONDIT et al. v. CONDIT et al." Results 2661 - 2680 of 3,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2010, 10:30 am by E. coli Lawyer
Surveys reported the incidence of Salmonella in wheat flour ranged from 0.14% to 1.32% (Sperber et al., 2007), . . . [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm by Gideon
Yet in laboratories all over the world, research has consistently shown that most commonsense behavioral cues are not diagnostic of truth and deception (DePaulo et al., 2003). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am by thelawprofessor
Decided on December 22, 2009 Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 1847 117179/07 [*1]Ted Moustakis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Christie’s, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Project Denial The denial of a conditional use permit renewal is exempt from CEQA review. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am by Bill Ward
”   On November 24, 2009, the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in the matter of Daniel Goldstein et al vs. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:12 am
Bettauer United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit: King et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Vomero v City of New York, et al has unanimously held that the City of New York Board of Standards and Appeals abused its discretion in granting a use variance to use residentially-zoned property for commercial use. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Vomero v City of New York, et al has unanimously held that the City of New York Board of Standards and Appeals abused its discretion in granting a use variance to use residentially-zoned property for commercial use. [read post]
Nov. 20, 2009) (O'Neill)(A&M bonfire litigation aftermath, proportionate responsibility, responsible third party) (petition for review mooted by settlement and status change to "settling person") ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, ET AL. v. [read post]